Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com

Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com


Systematic, logical, and objective approaches are essential when examining empirical data, especially in the context of near-death studies. This data should be reliable and analytical, allowing for replicable results with a testable and falsifiable hypothesis that contributes to the ongoing debate surrounding life after death and the scientific evidence supporting various theories.

Research Director Kenneth M. Coon, a 47-year Nuclear Health Physics professional and leader of Significant Event Investigations, emphasizes the importance of scientific evidence in the exploration of life after death and near-death studies.
Please reach us at AfterlifeEvidenceLLC@gmail.com if you cannot find an answer to your question.
Add an answer to this item
Add an answer to this item.
We would love to be able to tell you exactly "how" our design will yield the results but that is the proprietary aspect of our work. When the research is over, we will publish the results for the world to see! Thanks for asking
I do not know, someday I will write a memoir to explain but I never had an NDE or been around anyone having a Deathbed Vision. I truly believe it was just my destiny to try and solve this question.
As with most research, it all starts with publishing a paper in a Journal that is aligned with your mission. For me, that is the Journal of Near-Death Studies. My paper is to be in the January 2026 issue. The next step follows that as the paper had an open door request for a Hospice Organization or a University open to the research concept. That is status as of December 24, 2025
We love our customers and are eager to discuss fascinating topics such as life after death and near-death studies but it will need to be done with this contact form or an email.
Open today | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm |
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.